[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp |
Date: |
Sun, 01 May 2016 22:56:02 +0300 |
> From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
> Cc: rfflrccrd@gmail.com, 21072@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 21:45:37 +0200
>
> > So if we say "either precedes or follows point" instead of "follows
> > point", all will be well?
>
> Formally, yes. Though I guess it would be a bit better to fix the
> commands so that it's behavior matches the docs.
Why do you think that? Why is it better to always mark the function
that follows point?
Me, I think that the current behavior is a kind of feature, since it
lets the user control whether the leading commentary before a function
will or won't be marked.
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/01
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/01
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/01
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/01
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/03
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/04
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/06
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/06
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/05/06
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Drew Adams, 2016/05/07
- bug#21072: 24.5; inconsistent behaviour of `C-M-h (mark-defun)' in Emacs Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/05/07