|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified |
Date: | Sun, 27 Mar 2016 18:42:35 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 |
On 03/27/2016 06:35 PM, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
It's less likely that the before/after `M-q' strings hash to the same md5 than cosmic rays reprogramming your Emacs into vi, so:
And yet, why would we allow such possibility? String comparison is plenty fast already.
Comparing the contents of xdisp.c to itself takes 0.2ms here. Try: (setq s (buffer-string)) (setq ss (copy-sequence s)) (benchmark 1 '(equal s ss))
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |