|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#22083: 25.0.50; hg: adding tag enhances the rev, modeline does not reflect |
Date: | Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:43:47 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/42.0 |
On 12/04/2015 04:27 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Suit yourself, but (a) it's different from every other VCS supported by VC,
Maybe because VC as a framework isn't really aware of branches, and that notion is fairly different among the backends.
But if it turns out that Hg tags are the same as Git branches, or Hg has a corresponding notion of branches, I think we should show them. Whether it is together with the revision number, or instead, should be decided by someone who uses Hg.
and (b) every Git expert always tells me that the branch is not important at all in Git.
That sounds like a poor rephrasing.Would you consider it unimportant if you commit and push a change to emacs-25, when you intended to push it to master?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |