bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding

[Mike Kupfer]

Drew Adams wrote:

> Perhaps, to be more precise, the difference is search that
> does or does not accept general regexp patterns as _input_.
> Those that do have "regexp" (or "-re-"?) in their name;
> those that do not do not have it.  The former do not
> support char folding; the latter do.  Is that correct (and
> complete)?

I'm afraid it's more complicated than that.  If nothing else, there's
the "word" family of search functions, which don't do character folding.

regards,
mike