[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:32:49 +0200 |
> Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:12:01 +0200
>
> On 11/26/2015 05:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > If we don't want to have duplicate qualified+unqualified entries for
> > OO languages, then no, there's nothing left to fix.
>
> Right. I thought that was also already done, for some reason.
It wasn't done because the discussion didn't reach any consent.
> Should we create a dedicated issue for that? It concerns not only C++,
> but also Lua (as we've found out recently), and other languages (whether
> we want to tackle them now or not).
Yes, we could create a separate issue.