[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:52:07 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> How about enhancing the definition of setq to say that with 17
> arguments, NONE of the assignments are done? This should be relatively
> straight forward to code up in the byte compiler, even in the lexical
> binding case.
I prefer atomic operations whenever possible, so I'd rather than the whole
setq would fail. This catches the error earlier, and leaves the environment in
a condition that makes it easier to reproduce that error (it's possible that
some of the variable settings might change the code path such that the setq is
no longer performed).
John
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, (continued)
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Drew Adams, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, John Wiegley, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Drew Adams, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, John Wiegley, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, John Wiegley, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/26
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Drew Adams, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument,
John Wiegley <=
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, John Mastro, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Johan Bockgård, 2015/11/25
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Andreas Schwab, 2015/11/26
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/26
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/26
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/26
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/26
- bug#20241: 25.0.50; `setq' with only one argument, Nicolas Richard, 2015/11/25