[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#20168: 25.0.50; (elisp) `Accessing Mouse', for `posn-object-x-y'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#20168: 25.0.50; (elisp) `Accessing Mouse', for `posn-object-x-y' |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:41:28 +0200 |
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 11:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: 20168@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > > The doc string is OK. The manual is misleading/incorrect, in this
> > > regard: it speaks about a case where "the POSITION is a buffer
> > > position". This is wrong, as a buffer position in Emacs means a natural
> > > number 1,2... (or a marker).
> >
> > Why is it wrong?
>
> It is wrong to say that the value is a buffer position, because a
> buffer position is a number, not a position object (which is a cons).
>
> > > Maybe what should be said in this case is
> > > that "POSITION represents a buffer position". Its value cannot be
> > > simply a buffer position, which is a number or a marker.
> >
> > Why not? And what's the difference between the current text and your
> > suggestion?
>
> The difference is the difference between "is" and "represents".
> The value *is* not a buffer position (which is a number). It *is*
> a position object (which is a cons). It represents a buffer position
> in this case.
>
> It's a minor point, but it was enough to confuse me into trying
> to pass an actual buffer position. Nothing in the current
> description says that POSITION must be a position object (i.e.,
> something for which `posnp' returns non-nil).
OK, fixed. Thanks.