[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19479: Copyright issue
From: |
Kelly Dean |
Subject: |
bug#19479: Copyright issue |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:20:31 +0000 |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> If I sign an assignment document, then I would be committing perjury.
>
> No, the assignment document is just for the Emacs code you wrote and
> whose copyright you own. It simply doesn't apply to the code whose
> copyright you don't own (which normally only happens when the copyright
> is owned by your employer).
I don't have a copy of it handy, but if that's the way it's worded, then you're
right, it wouldn't be illegal for me to sign it. It would only be immoral. It
would be legally vacuous, and deceptive, leading to doubt about my intent.
- bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, (continued)
- bug#19479: Copyright issue (was: Re: bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable), Kelly Dean, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, David Kastrup, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Stefan Monnier, 2015/01/10
- bug#19479: Copyright issue,
Kelly Dean <=
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/01/11
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/12
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Richard Stallman, 2015/01/10
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Glenn Morris, 2015/01/09
- bug#19479: Copyright issue, Glenn Morris, 2015/01/09
bug#19479: (on-topic) Re: bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/10
bug#19479: Disclaimer is now on file at FSF, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/20
bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable, Kelly Dean, 2015/01/06