|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | bug#17625: 24.4.50; All installed packages marked "unsigned", no archive listed |
Date: | Fri, 30 May 2014 12:28:46 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The mechanism by which they are supposed to do so seems completely > undocumented (it's not even mentioned in NEWS), so I have no idea how they > are expected to do so. Indeed. I think there are several bugs here, which we should fix before the 24.4 release: - the "unsigned" thingy (is this supposed to check the signature of installed packages? How could that work? I thought we wanted to check the signature *during* installation). - the fact that GNU ELPA's packages aren't signed. - the fact that the expected signature format is not documented. Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |