bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#17510: 24.3.91; Problem with `emacs --daemon' in cygw32 build


From: Ken Brown
Subject: bug#17510: 24.3.91; Problem with `emacs --daemon' in cygw32 build
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 08:38:14 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

On 5/19/2014 3:25 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 5/19/2014 12:46 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
I guess it's OK for the branch, thanks.  But it strikes me that simply
replacing the car of dpyinfo->name_list_element by something like
"!!!DELETED DISPLAY!!!", or even just an empty string, would serve the
same purpose, and save us the nuisance of an additional list in
cygw32_display_name_list.  After all, all you need is to mark a
display deleted without actually deleting it, right?  IOW, the main
problem is in x_delete_display, and all the rest is just the overhead
you needed to fix that, correct?

I think that's correct, and I agree that there should be a much simpler
fix.  I'll have to look into the code and try to understand better
exactly what happens when emacs is started as a daemon and then a client
frame is opened and closed.

My guess as to the cause of this bug was completely wrong. What happens in my recipe is that the pointer dpyinfo->w32_id_name is freed twice. (This is done in x_delete_display each time the only existing client frame is deleted.) An attempt to create a client frame for the third time then leads to a crash because of malloc corruption.

I have no idea why this problem only showed up after Dmitry's code cleanup. The only thing I can think of is that maintaining a list of display names, with insertions and deletions, masked the malloc corruption.

I think the right fix here would be to really delete the display when x_delete_display is called, free all resources, and set things up so that everything will be re-initialized if a new frame is created. But this seems like a lot of trouble, possibly with unintended consequences. The following is a much simpler workaround:

=== modified file 'src/w32term.c'
--- src/w32term.c       2014-04-16 14:00:39 +0000
+++ src/w32term.c       2014-05-24 12:13:15 +0000
@@ -6426,7 +6426,9 @@
     if (dpyinfo->palette)
       DeleteObject (dpyinfo->palette);
   }
+#ifndef CYGWIN
   xfree (dpyinfo->w32_id_name);
+#endif

   w32_reset_fringes ();
 }

I would of course add a comment explaining this.  What do you think?

Ken





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]