bug#17247: 24.4.50; end-of-defun bug in elisp

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 20.05.2014 17:20, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Anyway, the patch below seems to work fine. Not sure what the purpose of
> > `end-of-line' was there.
>
> As Andreas mentioned, the end-of-line is there to make sure
> we "stay put" in case `pos' is already at a beginning of defun.

Is the current bug invalid, then?

If we "stay put" in the current defun (which starts right after point), 
then when passed an argument of -1, shouldn't `end-of-defun' go to the 
end of the previous defun, which happens to be the same position?