[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14086: 24.3.50; `substitute-command-keys': inappropriate "(that bind
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#14086: 24.3.50; `substitute-command-keys': inappropriate "(that binding is currently shadowed by another mode)" |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 20:40:05 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> But near the end of the listing (not at all near that entry), I see this
> other entry for `M-r':
>
> M-r previous-matching-history-element
> (that binding is currently shadowed by another mode)
Yeah, kinda awkward way of putting it. What about just
(binding currently shadowed)
?
> That makes no sense, or is at least misleading. There is no special
> "mode" that I am aware of that is involved here, for one thing. And I
> don't see how the `previous-matching-history-element' binding is
> "shadowed", whether by "another mode" or any other way. `M-r' is simply
> bound to `icicle-roundup' in this keymap - it is not bound to
> `previous-matching-history-element' in this map, AFAIK.
>
> Seems like a bug to me. At the very least it is unhelpful and
> misleading for a user who sees this. (Not to mention the fact that this
> extra info, if you think it serves a purpose, is far from the first
> `M-r' entry, so a user will likely see one or the other but not both
> together (unless the keymap has few keys in it).
I think it sounds useful to list bindings that would normally be on the
map unless something had redefined the key.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#14086: 24.3.50; `substitute-command-keys': inappropriate "(that binding is currently shadowed by another mode)",
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=