[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5264: 23.1; `repeat' should not hard-code the set of affected comman
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#5264: 23.1; `repeat' should not hard-code the set of affected commands |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:28:14 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> In the definition of command `repeat':
>
> (if (memq last-repeatable-command
> '(exit-minibuffer
> minibuffer-complete-and-exit
> self-insert-and-exit))
[...]
> This list of commands should be treated the same way we treat the list
> of dangerous commands (`repeat-too-dangerous'): define a variable
> whose value is the list of commands - do not hard-code the list.
I agree, but probably not during the feature freeze.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#5264: 23.1; `repeat' should not hard-code the set of affected commands,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=