[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:31:23 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 21:06:14 +0100
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
> CC: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>, drew.adams@oracle.com,
> 16691@debbugs.gnu.org, control@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > Since this started happening only lately, Martin, could you please see
> > if some of your changes could possibly disrupt the glyph row's hash
> > values?
>
> If you told me how I could have done that, maybe. I don't have the
> slightest idea.
I don't know if you did that. I just took a look at the latest
changes preceding the first revno where Drew reported this.
As to how this could happen: did any of your changes affect the 'used'
field of the glyph_row structure, under any circumstances?
- bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Drew Adams, 2014/02/08
- bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/02/08
- bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, martin rudalics, 2014/02/09
- bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/09
- bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, martin rudalics, 2014/02/09
- bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/09
- bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, martin rudalics, 2014/02/10
- bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/10
- bug#16691: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, martin rudalics, 2014/02/10