[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16118: 24.3.50; ruby-smie-rules: hanging literal in first method cal
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
bug#16118: 24.3.50; ruby-smie-rules: hanging literal in first method call argument is indented 1 column too few |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:48:41 +0200 |
We have this example in indent/ruby.rb:
foo({
a: b,
c: d
})
- The curlies don't line up.
- If I expand this example, the hash literal in the first argument
doesn't line up with the arguments after it:
foo({
a: b,
c: d
},
{
e: f
})
foo({
a: b,
c: d
}, :bar => {
e: f
})
foo(:bar =>
{
a: b,
c: d
}, :tee =>
{
e: f
})
...but:
foo({
a: b,
c: d
}, {
e: f
})
Still, I think the literals should be lined up to the first column after
"(", not the column of "(" itself. How can we do that?
Adding a `(1+ )' in the relevant place in `ruby-smie-rules' is an
obvious solution, but it breaks other examples.
In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.8 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.8.6)
of 2013-12-09 on axl
Bzr revision: 115440 dmantipov@yandex.ru-20131209163052-oess75ps2o5tt61q
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11403000
System Description: Ubuntu 13.10
- bug#16118: 24.3.50; ruby-smie-rules: hanging literal in first method call argument is indented 1 column too few,
Dmitry Gutov <=