[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:53:43 -0800 (PST) |
> > > The backtrace looks bogus, btw:
> > Not sure what you mean by that.
>
> Line 161 in w32menu.c is this:
> { <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> Line 451 in emacs.c is this:
> name = Fexpand_file_name (Vinvocation_name, dir); <<<<<<<<<<<
>
> and it does not call anything in w32menu.c. Etc. and etc.: this
> simply cannot be a valid sequence of call-stack frames.
I see. The code that generates such a "bogus" backtrace would seem
to be somewhat mistaken or incorrect, in that case.
But the backtrace, however inaccurate, is genuine - not at all bogus;
I can assure you of that.
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, (continued)
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Drew Adams, 2013/11/27
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Drew Adams, 2013/11/27
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/27
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Drew Adams, 2013/11/27
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/27
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Drew Adams, 2013/11/28
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/27
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Drew Adams, 2013/11/27
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/27
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/24
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/25
- bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt, Drew Adams, 2013/11/25