[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13594: 24.2.92; [PATCH] compilation-start doesn't consider nil OUTWI
|
From: |
Leo Liu |
|
Subject: |
bug#13594: 24.2.92; [PATCH] compilation-start doesn't consider nil OUTWIN |
|
Date: |
Sun, 17 Nov 2013 13:18:44 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.9) |
On 2013-03-20 20:51 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> That's one possibility, yes. Tho adding an argument doesn't sound
> much fun. So I'd prefer if it could be passed via ACTION.
I have read this bug thread again. I am confused by this decision. Why
do we want to tell display-buffer to do nothing (via ACTION or extra
arg) when we can choose not to call it? Isn't not calling it better?
Leo
- bug#13594: 24.2.92; [PATCH] compilation-start doesn't consider nil OUTWIN,
Leo Liu <=