[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable
From: |
Dani Moncayo |
Subject: |
bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:31:08 +0200 |
>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12572#8
>
> [The argument there is that if `C-x u u u...' repeats `undo' then typing
> `u' directly after that will not insert a `u' character.]
>
> Fair enough. And thank you - it's always good to see real arguments for
> and against a proposal.
>
> It's a good argument. Not a particularly strong one, IMO, but reasonable.
>
> It's not strong because there are other, simple ways of exiting `undo' so
> `u' will then insert (`<left> <right>', `x DEL', whatever).
Yes, there would be other ways of exiting undo, but I definitely
prefer not having to "exit" `undo'.
In general, I think that modal operations should be avoided as much as
possible, because IMO, they make the user interface more complex
(uglier, worse...).
--
Dani Moncayo
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, (continued)
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, Drew Adams, 2013/09/01
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, Stefan Monnier, 2013/09/02
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, Drew Adams, 2013/09/02
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, Jambunathan K, 2013/09/02
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, Drew Adams, 2013/09/02
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, Dani Moncayo, 2013/09/03
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, Drew Adams, 2013/09/03
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable,
Dani Moncayo <=
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, Drew Adams, 2013/09/03
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, Dani Moncayo, 2013/09/03
- bug#15234: 24.3.50; Make C-x u repeatable, Jambunathan K, 2013/09/03