[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions
From: |
Jan Djärv |
Subject: |
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:59:34 +0200 |
9 jun 2013 kl. 06:37 skrev James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>:
>>>>>> "SM" == Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
> SM> An almost 10 times slowdown for the -O0 case is really problematic.
> SM> IOW I think it'll be a fine idea but only when -Og is supported in
> SM> Debian stable.
>
> Jessie has gcc-4.8, so that is just one more freeze/thaw cycle.
>
> However long that takes. :^)
Some distibutions will never get gcc 4.8. Not everybody upgrades to the latest
version.
I think it would be a big mistake to introduce a x10 slowdown for pre 4.8 gcc
users.
Jan D.
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/06
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Andreas Schwab, 2013/06/06
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/06
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/08
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/15
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/15
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/17
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/09