bug#14062: bug#14389: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt

[Drew Adams]

> I think this part was with an earlier binary, not the one you reported
> (because the result of using this backtrace doesn't make any sense at
> all).

I don't think so.  After the crash I brought up the same version to report it.

I typically use only one Emacs 24 build at a time, the latest one I have (unless
it is totally unusable).

If I ever mistake the version (e.g. what crashed vs what I reported from) then
it would likely be a completely different release (e.g. Emacs 23 vs 24).  Not
necessarily, but likely.

> What was the previous version you used?

The previous binary I have to the one I reported about (from 5/10), is from 5/4:

In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2013-05-04 on ODIEONE
Bzr revision: 112449 monnier@iro.umontreal.ca-20130504193419-kbd4imjj1yxr5ksz
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
Configured using:
 `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags
 -IC:/Devel/emacs/build/include --ldflags -LC:/Devel/emacs/build/lib'

> My guess is it was
> emacs-20130502-r112438-bin-i386.zip, which brings us to something very
> similar to bug #14236, #13154, and #13980

No, I have no binary from 5/2. The one I have prior to 5/4 is from 4/26.

HTH.