[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1 |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:27:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>> "hi-lock-1", "hi-lock-2", etc. are the best names.
>>> My earlier mail asked for making the highlighting face a "core" one. So
>>> having highlight-1, highlight-2 etc as "core" themable faces will make
>>> theme designers pay attention to it.
>> We could definitely add such core faces. But in order for that to
>> augment current functionality, we still need a way for the user to
>> specify the highlighting directly by its attribute.
> The last sentence after the comma is not clear to me. You seem to imply
> some-"way" is missing. Can someone explain what is meant here?
I meant "in hi-lock". More specifically, the current hi-lock lets you
choose a face name, not a color. Since current face names include
"hi-yellow", it ends up letting you choose a color, but if we rename
them to something else, that removes this (indirect) ability to specify
a color.
Stefan
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, (continued)
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Drew Adams, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Drew Adams, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Drew Adams, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Juri Linkov, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1,
Stefan Monnier <=
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26