[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlig
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment? |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:07:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>> Seems to be working now (haven't tried before my recent changes, tho).
>>> By now, if you mean 111134, the unhighlighting is not working as
>>> expected.
>> Can you give a recipe, because "it works for me",
> How about a screenshot?
That can work as well, tho since it's not a display problem,
explanations work at least as well, usually better.
I never use hi-lock, so don't assume I know how it's expected to behave.
> Recipe-1:
> Couple of C-x w h, followed by C-x w r. Note the cursor position
> and the choice offered.
I don't see anything wrong with the cursor position. Please explain.
> See screenshot. Why is there no default offered
Don't know, should there be one?
> and why even absurd candidates are offered?
Which absurd candidates are you talking about?
> Recipe-2:
> Turn off font-lock-mode.
> Couple of C-x w h and then try C-x w r, C-u C-x w r, try from menu.
What am I supposed to see when I try that?
Stefan
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, (continued)
bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Jambunathan K, 2012/12/06
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Jambunathan K, 2012/12/06
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/06
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Drew Adams, 2012/12/06
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Jambunathan K, 2012/12/06
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/06
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Jambunathan K, 2012/12/06
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Jambunathan K, 2012/12/06
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/07
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Jambunathan K, 2012/12/08
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Jambunathan K, 2012/12/09
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/10
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Jambunathan K, 2012/12/10
- bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/10