[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12193: 24.1.50; 24.1.50; Completion broken in revno 109116
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#12193: 24.1.50; 24.1.50; Completion broken in revno 109116 |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:41:41 +0300 |
> From: chad <yandros@MIT.EDU>
> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:29:22 -0700
> Cc: 12193@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On 13 Aug 2012, at 19:50, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> >> With this recipe, it still happens in revno 109117.
> >
> > Which is 500 revisions old. Maybe you should resync.
>
> I wonder if this is a bazaar numbering issue? My first report was from a sync
> that was less than an hour old; the second was less than 5 minutes old. I do
> have a few private patches on that branch, so maybe that's my fault? I'm a
> bazaar novice.
If your branch is not bound to the upstream branch, then revision
numbers are useless, because they have no relation to the trunk. You
should then use revision-ids, not revnos.
> P.S. I'll admit to being amused that my report mentioned that the cursor was
> in the wrong window, and I got the reply ``but the cursor shouldn't be in
> that window''. :-)
I never said anything like that.