[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:06:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> How does this change affect performance with -O0?
> It hurts it. In normal operation I don't notice --
> everything is plenty fast enough -- but in an artificial
> benchmark designed to stress the new code (see below) the
> performance is significantly worse. If this is an issue,
> we can mark these new functions with __attribute__
> ((__always_inline__)), but I'm inclined to try things
> without this attribute, and resort to the attribute only if
> needed.
I always run with -O0 (plus ENABLE_CHECKING, and to add insult to
injury, on Atom-level platforms), so I'd appreciate if you could ensure
those functions are inlined even in -O0.
> 1.332 1.82 current (-O0)
> 1.410 11.86 patched (-O0)
That would really hurt: my Emacs sessions already tend to feel sluggish
without this extra pain.
Stefan
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Richard Stallman, 2012/07/16
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/16
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/16
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/16
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/23
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/24
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2012/07/24