[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10906: 24.0.94; `c-mark-function' does set the mark well
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
bug#10906: 24.0.94; `c-mark-function' does set the mark well |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:49:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hello, Dani.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:37:10PM +0100, Dani Moncayo wrote:
> > Here's a revised patch. I think it'll work this time.
> It works, thank you.
I've committed a patch for this into savannah.
> BTW, I have a question (I've still a beginner on elisp): What's the
> point of the "or" form here?
> > + (or (and (eq this-command 'c-mark-function)
> > + (eq last-command 'c-mark-function))))
> It has a single argument, so that it would be equivalent to get rid of
> it, like this:
> > + (and (eq this-command 'c-mark-function)
> > + (eq last-command 'c-mark-function)))
Yes! That was a coding mistake, thanks for picking it up.
> ??
> --
> Dani Moncayo
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
bug#10906: 24.0.94; `c-mark-function' does set the mark well, Glenn Morris, 2012/03/01