[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:49:46 +0200 |
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
> Cc: 9990@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:21:56 -0500
>
> BTW, why is the hash only using 28 bits instead of the full 32? Won't
> it get a bit more precision if using 32?
I don't know. I suspect this is simply history inherited from a
similar (but not identical -- why?) code in line_hash_code, which also
uses 28 bits.
Richard, do you remember by chance why only 28 bits are used?
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, (continued)
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/12
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Dan Nicolaescu, 2011/11/15
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/15
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/18
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Dan Nicolaescu, 2011/11/18
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/18
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Dan Nicolaescu, 2011/11/18
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/19
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Dan Nicolaescu, 2011/11/20
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Dan Nicolaescu, 2011/11/15
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#9990: valgrind warning in add_row_entry, Dan Nicolaescu, 2011/11/11