[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:14:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> writes:
> Even if you had such a feature it would not DTRT with multiple windows
> showing the same buffer on the same frame. But if, in step (9) above,
> you do `previous-buffer' or `switch-to-prev-buffer', the window's point
> should show up at `point-min'. `switch-to-buffer' could, in principle,
> retrieve that position by scanning `window-prev-buffers' of that window.
I think `switch-to-buffer' should do the same as `previous-buffer' here
-- it seems like the obvious solution. Is there any reason not to?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local, martin rudalics, 2011/10/07
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/10/07
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local, martin rudalics, 2011/10/07
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local, Steve Yegge, 2011/10/07
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local, Leo, 2011/10/08
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/08
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local, Drew Adams, 2011/10/08
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local, martin rudalics, 2011/10/08
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/08
- bug#4041: 23.0.92; Emacs 23: buffer point is no longer frame-local, martin rudalics, 2011/10/08