|
From: | martin rudalics |
Subject: | bug#9639: 24.0.90; Problem with bury-buffer in minibuffer-hide-completions |
Date: | Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:50:34 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> No. Either both are deleted or both are iconified, since (again) it is > mostly a choice that depends on the general window-manager usage and > user preference. > >> Basically, it would be nice to get rid of either `bury-buffer' or >> `quit-window'. Having two functions do approximately the same thing is >> neither reasonable for developers nor for users. > > I think both are in fairly wide use, so getting rid of one of them is > not really an option. But I hope we can define one in terms of > the other (or both in terms of a third internal one). I now try to handle burying buffers via `quit-window' and `bury-buffer' in a uniform manner. All this in a new function called `window--delete' (which is also called by `replace-buffer-in-windows' although the latter always deletes the frame if possible). martin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |