[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g
|
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
|
Subject: |
bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g |
|
Date: |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:57:34 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Exactly. Saying "(must include -l)" is simple and clear, and fully
> correct.
No, because it doesn't have to include -l. -o and -g does not imply -l.
It's kinda like -l, though.
So "(must include -l or similar)" might be best...
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/10
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11