|
From: | martin rudalics |
Subject: | bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:56:32 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> I guess because pop-up-frames defaults to nil in Emacs 23. Emacs 23 could pop up new frame provided the selected frame isn't "usable". > But in the trunk, a default Emacs may now pop-up a frame if it thinks it > necessary. I only tried to mimic Emacs 23 here. So if the original frame cannot be used it does try to pop up a new one. Doesn't Emacs make an invisible frame in batch mode? Maybe the problem happens because I now load window.el _before_ files.el. So in Emacs 23 files.el maybe tried to display a buffer but failed silently. What happens generally in batch mode when you call `display-buffer', for example, during a backtrace? martin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |