|
From: | martin rudalics |
Subject: | bug#8857: display-buffer attempt to pop-up frame in batch mode causes "Unknown terminal type" error |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:16:16 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> OK, this is not a very sensible example, but it illustrates the point. > It's caused by display-buffer trying to pop-up a frame in batch-mode and > is very recent. Can you tell me where and why `display-buffer' is called? > PS I forgot to say that I think display-buffer should not try to pop-up > frames (or do anything at all?) in batch-mode. Or if it must give an > error it should try to give a more helpful one than "Unknown terminal > type". In particular not with emacs -Q. But I have no experience debugging emacs with the batch option. So before delving into this maybe you could give me more information? Note that while `pop-up-frames' has the optional value graphic-only which should prevent Emacs from popping up frames on non-graphic systems, that value is consistently overridden by applications that bind `pop-up-frames' to t. But I don't think that's related. martin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |