[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:04:57 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> "Allow deleting windows less than this tall....
> Emacs honors settings of this variable when enlarging
> or shrinking windows vertically."
[...]
>> If you have a one line window and an nine lines window in a ten
>> lines frame and you want to enlarge the nine lines window by one
>> line Emacs 23 will probably delete the one line window.
> That sounds like a bug - it contradicts the doc. Why shouldn't
> enlargement be prevented instead, in that case?
If you read the above docstring carefully, you'll see that it doesn't
say "don't make windows smaller than that" but just that if a window
gets smaller it'll be deleted.
I do think it's a misfeature, but it's not one that's trivial to fix.
IIUC Martin has worked on a fix, but he hasn't submitted it yet, so
I guess it's not quite ready for prime time.
Stefan
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, (continued)
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer,
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/14
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/14