[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5408: date-to-time problem
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
bug#5408: date-to-time problem |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:31:37 +0100 |
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> wrote:
> Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 16:26, Lennart Borgman
>> <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Can't you please just put in the remarks? In a case like this it is
>>> more effective I think.
>>
>> Remarks? If it is causing confusion to users of the functions, it
>> should be documented.
>
> I think he meant "can't *you* please just put in the remarks". Â Anyhow,
> I've checked in the dox fixes now.
Yes ;-)
Thanks.
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, (continued)
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem,
Lennart Borgman <=
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18