bug#4520: marked as done (downcasing function arguments by default not appropriate in multi-tty)

[Emacs bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:25:22 +0200
with message-id <f7ccd24b0909241225x11ab6a76qc2e4bfe437bd046b@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#4510: 23.1; Separate help-argument-face from downcasing
has caused the Emacs bug report #4520,
regarding downcasing function arguments by default not appropriate in multi-tty
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
4520: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4520
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> downcasing function arguments by default not appropriate in multi-tty
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
>
> *Help* buffers downcase function arguments depending on the font in use
>  (if it supports italics?).
> Changing a buffer's contents based on the font is use is not appropriate
> since we have multi-tty, the same buffer can be shown simultaneously in
> an X11 frame and a tty frame, and the properties of the font used in the
> X11 frame can be very different from the ones used in a tty frame.
>
> So changing the buffer content _by_default_ is not a good idea.
> AFAIK we do not do such a thing anywhere else in emacs.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#4510: 23.1; Separate help-argument-face from downcasing
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:25:22 +0200
>
>
>
>
> I've installed the patch, defaulting `help-downcase-arguments' to nil
> as per Dan's request in bug#4520.
>
> If someone objects to the change in the default appearance of argument
> names we'll know soon enough...
>
>     Juanma
>
> --- End Message ---