[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:12:57 +0200 |
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> The distinction I made is between buffers that are mostly free-form text,
> where
> newlines are typically not intentionally positioned by the user or by Emacs,
> and
> the other buffers, where they are.
Is not that a difficult distinction here? (In a word processor it
would be different.) Exactly how do you do the distinction - as simple
as possible, because if it is useful it must be easy to understand?
One point I mentioned before is that code might look scrambled, but
maybe that point could be cured some way? (If it really have to be
cured ...)
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, (continued)
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Stefan Monnier, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/06/02
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil,
Lennart Borgman <=
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/06/01
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/06/12
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Stefan Monnier, 2009/06/12
- bug#3438: please make line-move-visual nil, Drew Adams, 2009/06/12