[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place
From: |
Roland Winkler |
Subject: |
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place |
Date: |
Mon, 18 May 2009 17:04:07 +0200 |
On Mon May 18 2009 martin rudalics wrote:
> I meant whether `proced' which uses `pop-to-buffer' has any preferences
> about where and how to pop up that buffer.
I see. I have never much thought about that. If anyone has some
argument why it might be better that Proced used something else
instead of a simple call of pop-to-buffer, I'd be happy to use some
appropriate code. Otherwise I suggest to keep it the way it is now
(or wait till after the next release). Certainly, Proced is
different from Dired in the sense that normally one will have only
one such buffer.
Roland
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, (continued)
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Roland Winkler, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place,
Roland Winkler <=
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Stefan Monnier, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/05/18