bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#870: marked as done (Missing ^J in ChangeLog)


From: Emacs bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#870: marked as done (Missing ^J in ChangeLog)
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:00:03 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:54:10 +0800
with message-id <496489D2.8030902@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870
has caused the Emacs bug report #870,
regarding Missing ^J in ChangeLog
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
870: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Missing ^J in ChangeLog Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:03:17 +0200
Sometimes, while editing a ChangeLog file, one or several ^J disappear.

It could be related to doing other modifications to the ChangeLog
(reverting the buffer when there's outside changes while trying to
commit, for example), but so far there is no recipe to reproduce it.

The bug has been observed many times, and by at least two developers. It
seems to be confined to the Windows port.

emacs-devel discussion:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-06/msg02050.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-07/msg00075.html



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870 Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:54:10 +0800 User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
Juanma Barranquero wrote:
Thanks! (I've been suffering this #$@!&* for the past eight months or so.)

As usual, a repeatable test case helps a lot more than a mysterious occurrence that a few people have seen but noone can explain.

I've added the "(Bug#870)" ref to your ChangeLog entry.

And I've added "-done" to the bug-address Cc to close the bug report (and removed emacs-devel to cut down on the duplicates that end up on the list).



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]