bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#1267: marked as done (Emacsclient can't find terminal in daemon mod


From: Emacs bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#1267: marked as done (Emacsclient can't find terminal in daemon mode)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:05:05 -0700

Your message dated Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:57:28 -0400
with message-id <87d4hif53r.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>
and subject line Re: bug#1267: Emacsclient can't find terminal in daemon mode
has caused the Emacs bug report #1267,
regarding Emacsclient can't find terminal in daemon mode
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
1267: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1267
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Emacsclient can't find terminal in daemon mode Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:04:48 -0400
$ emacs --daemon
$ emacsclient foo.m
Waiting for Emacs...

Emacsclient then stops, waiting indefinitely (IIUC, it opens a frame on
the emacs daemon's "fake" terminal, which is inaccessible to the user).
By contrast, `emacsclient -c foo.m' and `emacsclient -t foo.m' do the
right thing.

I think the Emacs server should do the right thing automatically, but
dunno how hard that would that be to implement.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#1267: Emacsclient can't find terminal in daemon mode Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:57:28 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu> writes:

> Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> writes:
>
>   > How bout something on these lines?
>
> Looks good to me (provided it actually works :-)

I've checked in a similar patch.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]