bug#1142: marked as done (M-x man vs. underlining)

[Emacs bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:16:45 -0400
with message-id <t2od1l6mci.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#1142: M-x man vs. underlining
has caused the Emacs bug report #1142,
regarding M-x man vs. underlining
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
1142: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1142
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> M-x man vs. underlining
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:56:50 +0800
>
>
>
>
> $ emacs -Q
> M-x man man
> One notices the total lack of underlining emphasis vs. $ man man in the shell,
> or M-x woman. What should be underlined appears as plain text. Or
> maybe it's just me... emacs-version "22.2.1"
> By the way, woman shows the table in that page as 1@Executable... however.
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#1142: M-x man vs. underlining
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:16:45 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> 2008-10-16  Glenn Morris  <rgm@gnu.org>
>
>   * man.el (Man-getpage-in-background): Force recent `man's
>   to output escape sequences even when stdout is not a tty.  (Bug#1142)
>
>
> --- End Message ---