bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Weird emacs behavior


From: Leo Chang
Subject: RE: Weird emacs behavior
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:57:09 -0800

Weirdly enough, this behavior went away when I tried it this morning (after
a couple of days).  Emacs is working again.  I can't explain it at all.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ehud Karni [mailto:ehud@unix.mvs.co.il] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:46 AM
To: lchang@clickshift.com
Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Weird emacs behavior

 [ resent, there was a mistake in the mailing list name ]

On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:38:16 -0800, Leo Chang wrote:
>
> There is an unexplained behavior that we've seen on a few machines we have
> with emacs.  These are Redhat Enterprise Linux boxes that we usually ssh
to.
> Xforwarding works fine.  All X apps including emacs work fine.  Then,
after
> a long time (weeks or months), emacs stops appearing in its own window
when
> you ssh into the box.  Instead, after a long wait, it croaks with
something
> like "Connection Lost to Xserver. localhost 10:0."
>
> At this point, you can open ALL X applications except for emacs.  Xeyes,
> xclock, xterm, firefox all work!  But not emacs.  "emacs -nw" does work,
and
> emacs in its own Xwindow works if you're directly on the machine.
However,
> emacs will not open without the -nw option thru ssh.  (Even though it did
> while the machine was running for quite some time.)  Restarting the
machine
> fixes the problem.

Can you do "netstat -a" (look for listening ports in the 6000-6100 range)
when the problem occurs ?
Also, do "echo $DISPLAY".

Try to run "naked" emacs - emacs -q , what happens ?

Ehud.


--
 Ehud Karni           Tel: +972-3-7966-561  /"\
 Mivtach - Simon      Fax: +972-3-7966-667  \ /  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 Insurance agencies   (USA) voice mail and   X   Against   HTML   Mail
 http://www.mvs.co.il  FAX:  1-815-5509341  / \
 GnuPG: 98EA398D <http://www.keyserver.net/>    Better Safe Than Sorry





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]