[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [address@hidden: Re: ":" in Scheme names.]
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: [address@hidden: Re: ":" in Scheme names.] |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 19:02:12 -0800 |
From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:37:04 -0500 (EST)
let: No such anchor in tag table or node in tag table or file:
call-with-output-script: Batch
But it is evident that Info-try-follow-nearest-node is fixed if the
last line is instead:
| RET buffer changes to show batch funcs
oops, yes this is a mistake on my part in reporting the consequences of
the fix. the good news is that the "m RET" case is now fixed (revision
1.333 in cvs), as well.
w/ 1.333 i ran around slib.info and dired-x.info using "RET", "m", "l"
and various "i" (default/exact/inexact input) commands w/o problems.
please let me know if you find any new (and interesting) bugs, otherwise
i'm inclined to look at other things now. M-x viva-scheme!
thi