[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Nov 2001 10:57:38 +0200 |
On 24 Nov 2001, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> E> What's your point? Isn't it obvious that a Lisp code run by an
> E> interpreter would be slower than a tight optimized C program?
>
> I dunno, maybe internally have the real grep to do the hard work, by
> default, but keep the original occur code around for in case the user
> does not have grep on their operating system?
We have "M-x grep" for those who have Grep.
- occur slower than grep by a longshot, Dan Jacobson, 2001/11/22
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/22
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Dan Jacobson, 2001/11/24
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Dan Jacobson, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, David Kastrup, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, David Kastrup, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, David Kastrup, 2001/11/26
- Re: occur slower than grep by a longshot, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/25