[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unicode in emacs 21
From: |
Markus Kuhn |
Subject: |
Re: unicode in emacs 21 |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:26:17 +0000 |
Dave Love wrote on 2001-10-29 17:49 UTC:
> I don't think it's very important that reading and writing malformed
> sequences by utf-8.el isn't always idempotent. Presumably the three
> or four relevant test cases could be addressed in the CCL, but I think
> there are better things to spend the time on.
If you can edit the UTF-8 test file
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/examples/ UTF-8-test.txt
(which is rich in al forms of malformed UTF-8 sequences) without causing
surprising changes at places where you didn't insert/delete any
characters during editing, then things should be fine.
Markus
--
Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
Email: mkuhn at acm.org, WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/>
- unicode in emacs 21, Oliver Doepner, 2001/10/25
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, David Starner, 2001/10/27
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Janusz S. Bień, 2001/10/28
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Dave Love, 2001/10/28
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/29
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/29
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Stefan Monnier, 2001/10/29
- Re: unicode in emacs 21, Florian Weimer, 2001/10/30