[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setenv
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: setenv |
Date: |
21 Sep 2001 16:58:20 +0900 |
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> > 1) Have every call to elisp's `setenv' update the real environment as
> > well as `process-environment'; this seems not good because we want
> > calls to `setenv' to be no different than simply modifying the
> > variable `process-environment'.
>
> I don't understand the last sentence. Can you explain?
I mean that the user (or lisp programmer) can currently modify
`process-environment' directly, without using setenv, and expect it to
work in the obvious way. If setenv is made `special', then this ceases
to be the case.
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
- Re: setenv, (continued)
- Re: setenv, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/09/20
- Re: setenv, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/09/20
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/20
- Re: setenv, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/09/20
- Re: setenv, Andreas Schwab, 2001/09/21
- Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/21
- Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/20
Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/20
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/20
- Re: setenv, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/09/21
- Re: setenv,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Miles Bader, 2001/09/22
- Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/22
Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/23
Re: setenv, Hallvard B Furuseth, 2001/09/24
Re: setenv, Richard Stallman, 2001/09/25
Re: setenv, Thomas F. Burdick, 2001/09/25
Re: setenv, David desJardins, 2001/09/25