Re: Binary recognition is to narrow [new suggestion]

[Hideki IWAMOTO]

Hi.

The current specification is not preferable for me because Makefile
that contains Japanese comments is recognized as a binary file. 
I hope to switch to the specification that Erik suggested.  
May I commit the attached patch?

On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:17:51 +0100, Erik Jonsson wrote...
> What happened to this patch? Will it be merged? I can see that it's not in
> 
> the 5.8 release anyway. Will I have to patch every new version or will
> this 
> change be integrated?
> 
> /Erik J.
> 
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:52:15 +0900, "Shigio YAMAGUCHI" <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> >> > I would like to make the 512 a customizable variable too.
> >> 
> >> I examined the performance using attached test program.
> >> And I confirmed that execute time did not have a significant difference
> >> at size smaller than 512. I think that 512 is an appropriate value.
> > 
> > I understood. Fixed value 512 seems to be the best.
> > --
> > Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden>
> > PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663  C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3

----
Hideki IWAMOTO  address@hidden

20100303-is_binary.patch
Description: Binary data