[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1
From: |
Andreas Jaeger |
Subject: |
Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1 |
Date: |
14 Jan 2001 15:09:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> David Ford writes:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> > # cat configparms
>> > slibdir=/lib
>> > sysconfdir=/etc
>>
>> That's not needed, read the FAQ.
> FAQ section 2.2. I have read it. I am building a glibc package for my
> distribution, I will later use
> install_root. I don't want my new build located in a /usr/local base.
And I've written FAQ 2.2. ;-)
If you configure using --prefix=/usr (and nothing more) on Linux (!),
everything should go to the right place. If not, it's a bug - and
please report it. What goes in the wrong place?
>> > # grep "./configure" config.status
>> > # ./configure --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix= --enable-add-ons
>> > echo "running ${CONFIG_SHELL-/bin/sh} ./configure --prefix=/usr
>> > --exec-prefix= --enable-add-ons --no-create --no-recursion"
>> You don't need to pass exec-prefix.
> No, I don't, but it makes the aesthetics better. I get "/lib/libfile"
> instead of another form. This is the
> configure line I ended up with after multiple build tests. I don't want a
> base exec prefix of /usr, I want
> a base exec prefix of /. Using --exec-prefix=/ gets me "//lib/libfile"
> instead of "/lib/libfile".
>> > A side note, the web interface to gnats requires a login to browse, it
>> > appears that only developers or members are allowed to review the bugs.
>> Use guest/guest,
> Thank you, might you be so kind as to mention that on the website? :)
The site is currently reworked (that's out of my control),
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs address@hidden
private address@hidden
http://www.suse.de/~aj
- segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, David Ford, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, Andreas Jaeger, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, David Ford, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1,
Andreas Jaeger <=
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, David Ford, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, Andreas Jaeger, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, David Ford, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, Andreas Jaeger, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, David Ford, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, David Ford, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, David Ford, 2001/01/14
- Re: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, David Ford, 2001/01/15
- solved: segfault attempting to compile 2.2.1, David Ford, 2001/01/15