[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
[bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed |
Date: |
Thu, 28 May 2015 14:11:25 +0200 |
Hi,
In a source tree of nano, after I've edited a PO file, running a simple
'make' in the main directory will regenerate the corresponding GMO file.
But in the source trees of for example grep or texinfo this is not the
case; a 'make' will not update the GMO file, and even a 'make install'
will just install the existing .gmo file (which no longer matches with
the .po file). I think this is wrong.
Nano still contains a Makefile.in.in that belongs to gettext-0.11.5,
whereas grep and texinfo use the one from gettext-0.19.
Is there any way that modern gettext can in its Makefile.in.in make
each GMO file depend on its corresponding PO file?
(With source tree I mean an unpacked tarball.)
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Accessible with your email software
or over the web
- [bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed,
Benno Schulenberg <=
- Re: [bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed, Daiki Ueno, 2015/05/29
- Re: [bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/05/29
- Re: [bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed, Daiki Ueno, 2015/05/29
- Re: [bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/05/29
- Re: [bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed, Daiki Ueno, 2015/05/29
- Re: [bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/05/30
- Re: [bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed, Daiki Ueno, 2015/05/30
- Re: [bug-gettext] a .gmo file is not regenerated when its .po file changed, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/05/31