[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0
From: |
Andrew J. Schorr |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0 |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:36:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 01:05:26PM -0700, address@hidden wrote:
> I'm not up to starting on this now, but another tool for exploration
> would be to use the gawk debugger to see at what point in the awk
> program the data becomes bad.
>
> You can then add a call to stopme() right before it. Then rerun with
> gdb on gawk itself, set a breakoint in the C stopme() routine, and go
> from there.
This is the line that causes the assertion:
function label_exists_for_destination(linenos, destination, label, n, seen)
{
# This kludge resolves a data corruption issue in GNU Awk 4.2.0; TODO: root
# cause the problem and report it upstream.
# destination = destination ""
$0 = linenos
...
When that assignment occurs, the reference count on $1 is 2.
At that moment, the value of $0 is:
//#label_exists_for_destination
And $1 has the same value.
> Andy, thanks for looking into this; it does have the scent of code
> that you were involved with during development.
I am insanely buried. But this is a nasty bug...
Regards,
Andy
- [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0, Eric Pruitt, 2017/11/12
- Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/12
- Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0, Eric Pruitt, 2017/11/12
- Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0, Eric Pruitt, 2017/11/12
- Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/12
- Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0, Eric Pruitt, 2017/11/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0, arnold, 2017/11/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] Function argument corruption in 4.2.0,
Andrew J. Schorr <=
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Eric Pruitt, 2017/11/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, arnold, 2017/11/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, arnold, 2017/11/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, arnold, 2017/11/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] $0 reassignment corruption in 4.2, Andrew J. Schorr, 2017/11/14