[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH]
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH] |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Apr 2017 14:38:36 +0300 |
> From: address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:26:28 -0600
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > As to whether this result is horrible: I guess it depends on whether
> > we want the behavior to be more consistent across platforms. I'd like
> > at least to "fix" errno in this case to be EPIPE, then we can talk
> > about what exit status to produce. Does that make sense?
>
> Sounds like a plan to me. Thanks!
Now done on the master branch, including the proper exit status.
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH],
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], Eli Zaretskii, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], arnold, 2017/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH], alexandre.ferrieux, 2017/04/09