[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] mystrtonum for any awk (Was: Handling hexadecimals in dif
From: |
Jarno Suni |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] mystrtonum for any awk (Was: Handling hexadecimals in different modes) |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:05:36 +0300 |
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:51:14 +0300
Jarno Suni <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 21:55:49 +0300
> Jarno Suni <address@hidden> wrote:
>
[...]
> numbers. The function does not recognize thousand separators. It
> returns "NaN" for invalid numbers or "IB" for invalid base.
Oh, I suppose it is better to return "number" +nan, since awk
implementations seem to support it, and it will not be converted to 0
unlike string "NaN".
--
Jarno Ilari Suni - http://www.iki.fi/8/
- Re: [bug-gawk] Handling hexadecimals in different modes, Jarno Suni, 2015/09/01
- Re: [bug-gawk] Handling hexadecimals in different modes, Jarno Suni, 2015/09/06
- Re: [bug-gawk] Handling hexadecimals in different modes, Jarno Suni, 2015/09/07
- Re: [bug-gawk] Handling hexadecimals in different modes, arnold, 2015/09/08
- Re: [bug-gawk] Handling hexadecimals in different modes, Jarno Suni, 2015/09/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] mystrtonum for any awk (Was: Handling hexadecimals in different modes), Jarno Suni, 2015/09/22
- Re: [bug-gawk] mystrtonum for any awk (Was: Handling hexadecimals in different modes),
Jarno Suni <=
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-gawk] mystrtonum for any awk (Was: Handling hexadecimals in different modes), Jarno Suni, 2015/09/25
- Message not available
- Re: [bug-gawk] mystrtonum for any awk (Was: Handling hexadecimals in different modes), Jarno Suni, 2015/09/27
- Re: [bug-gawk] mystrtonum for any awk (Was: Handling hexadecimals in different modes), Jarno Suni, 2015/09/30
- Re: [bug-gawk] Handling hexadecimals in different modes, Jarno Suni, 2015/09/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] Handling hexadecimals in different modes, Aharon Robbins, 2015/09/15